马德兴：米利西奇不敢热身U17女足，一年半不换血，足协当断则断（马德兴：米利西奇回避U17女足热身，18个月不换血，足协应当机立断）

Considering response options

I could offer a concise summary and analysis to the user, and ask if they want more details. Since our knowledge cutoff is in October 2024 and today's date is December 27, 2025, I should avoid fabricating facts. If the report is accurate, I can analyze it but need to frame it carefully. The user hasn’t asked a direct question—just provided a title. So, I’ll ask for clarification: “Do you want a summary of the key points or a tactical analysis?” I’ll provide a few angles, too!Analyzing the situation

I want to create a concise analysis based on the allegations that Milicic didn't arrange a warm-up for the U17 women and that there hasn't been a squad refresh in 18 months, which suggests the FA should take action.

I’ll consider motivations like avoiding risks to confidence, injuries, and travel constraints, but it also indicates a lack of confidence. I need to check data on call-up age structure and minutes played, along with match schedules.

I should also highlight the risks of not rotating the squad and propose options if the FA decides to act, such as setting KPIs or changing coaching staff. Finally, I’ll ask the user if they want a summary or an opinion piece, but they might prefer to read the article.Drafting response options

I can start by asking the user if they want key points, context, or a Weibo-style comment. I’ll draft a brief takeaway first: the headline highlights three main issues: avoiding tests against youth, stagnant selection for the last 18 months, and a call for decisive FA action.

Next, I’ll outline what this means, how serious it is, what to watch for, and provide some recommendations. Finally, I’ll ask what format they prefer: a 100-word summary, in-depth analysis, fan comment, or a rebuttal angle. Oh, and I’ll respond in Chinese!